Junio C Hamano wrote:
> So I think it is better to quote these in this particular case.
>
> The pipe is purely subjective readability. I can go either way, but
> since I was the one who was applying the patch that needed other
> changes anyway... ;-)
You started by saying these were "not the matt
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras writes:
>>
>> > Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> >> As I have said in the recent What's cooking reports, the original
>> >> posted here were based on older codebase and needed to be rebased,
>> >> but it had some conflicts and I wante
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> As I have said in the recent What's cooking reports, the original
> >> posted here were based on older codebase and needed to be rebased,
> >> but it had some conflicts and I wanted to see the result double
> >> che
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> As I have said in the recent What's cooking reports, the original
>> posted here were based on older codebase and needed to be rebased,
>> but it had some conflicts and I wanted to see the result double
>> checked by the original author before w
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> As I have said in the recent What's cooking reports, the original
> posted here were based on older codebase and needed to be rebased,
> but it had some conflicts and I wanted to see the result double
> checked by the original author before we can merge it to 'next',
> cooke
As I have said in the recent What's cooking reports, the original
posted here were based on older codebase and needed to be rebased,
but it had some conflicts and I wanted to see the result double
checked by the original author before we can merge it to 'next',
cooked there and hopefully merged to
6 matches
Mail list logo
