On 31/08/18 01:54, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:49:39AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>> On 30/08/18 21:14, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Jeff King writes:
>>>
I suppose so. I don't think I've _ever_ used distclean, and I only
rarely use "clean" (a testament to our
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:49:39AM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> On 30/08/18 21:14, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Jeff King writes:
> >
> >> I suppose so. I don't think I've _ever_ used distclean, and I only
> >> rarely use "clean" (a testament to our Makefile's efforts to accurately
> >> track
On 30/08/18 21:14, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>> I suppose so. I don't think I've _ever_ used distclean, and I only
>> rarely use "clean" (a testament to our Makefile's efforts to accurately
>> track dependencies). I'd usually use "git clean" when I want something
>> pristine
Jeff King writes:
> I suppose so. I don't think I've _ever_ used distclean, and I only
> rarely use "clean" (a testament to our Makefile's efforts to accurately
> track dependencies). I'd usually use "git clean" when I want something
> pristine (because I don't want to trust the Makefile at
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 05:04:32AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:54 AM Jeff King wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] doc-diff: force worktree add
> >
> > We avoid re-creating our temporary worktree if it's already
> > there. But we may run into a situation where the worktree
>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:54 AM Jeff King wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] doc-diff: force worktree add
>
> We avoid re-creating our temporary worktree if it's already
> there. But we may run into a situation where the worktree
> has been deleted, but an entry still exists in
> $GIT_DIR/worktrees.
Can
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:54 AM Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:20:17PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > This series started as a fix for a bug reported by Peff[1] in which the
> > "database" of worktrees could be corrupted (or at least become
> > internally inconsistent) by having
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 05:20:17PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> This series started as a fix for a bug reported by Peff[1] in which the
> "database" of worktrees could be corrupted (or at least become
> internally inconsistent) by having multiple worktree entries associated
> with the same path.
This series started as a fix for a bug reported by Peff[1] in which the
"database" of worktrees could be corrupted (or at least become
internally inconsistent) by having multiple worktree entries associated
with the same path.
Peff's particular use-case for git-worktree is Documentation/doc-diff
9 matches
Mail list logo
