On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> It took me a while to get the idea how to realize parallelism with the
> parallel run command structure now as opposed to the thread pool I proposed
> earlier, but I think it will be straightforward from here.
>
Yea at
> I didn't say this in the previous round because it smelled like an
> RFC, but for a real submission, 2/2 may be doing too many things at
> once. I suspect this is more or less "taste" thing, so I won't mind
> too much as long as the reviewers are OK with it.
The patch 2/2 is now broken up into
2 matches
Mail list logo