Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
René Scharfe writes: > A short semantic patch with a limited time of usefulness and possible > side-effects can easily be included in a commit message, of course.. Yeah, I think that is Jonathan's favourite approach as well, and I do not have problem with that. This transition

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-13 Thread Stefan Beller
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:52 AM, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 12.02.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> René Scharfe writes: >> >>> Am 12.02.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Junio C Hamano: Stefan Beller writes: > I thought it may be a

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-13 Thread René Scharfe
Am 12.02.2018 um 22:48 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > René Scharfe writes: > >> Am 12.02.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >>> Stefan Beller writes: >>> I thought it may be a helpful for merging this series with the rest of the evolved code base which

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
René Scharfe writes: > Am 12.02.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Stefan Beller writes: >> >>> I thought it may be a helpful >>> for merging this series with the rest of the evolved code base which >>> may make use of one of the converted functions. So

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-12 Thread René Scharfe
[removed rene.scha...@lsrfire.ath.cx from cc:; I lost that domain a few years ago. Thanks for the heads-up, Stefan!] Am 12.02.2018 um 20:00 schrieb Stefan Beller: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Stefan Beller writes: >> >>>

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-12 Thread René Scharfe
Am 12.02.2018 um 22:04 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> I thought it may be a helpful >> for merging this series with the rest of the evolved code base which >> may make use of one of the converted functions. So instead of fixing >> that new instance

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > I thought it may be a helpful > for merging this series with the rest of the evolved code base which > may make use of one of the converted functions. So instead of fixing > that new instance manually, cocinelle could do that instead. Having the

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-12 Thread Stefan Beller
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> Patch generated by >> >> 2. Applying the semantic patch contrib/coccinelle/packed_git.cocci >> to adjust callers. > > About this part... > >> diff --git

Re: [PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > Patch generated by > > 2. Applying the semantic patch contrib/coccinelle/packed_git.cocci > to adjust callers. About this part... > diff --git a/contrib/coccinelle/packed_git.cocci > b/contrib/coccinelle/packed_git.cocci > new file mode 100644

[PATCH 003/194] object-store: move packed_git and packed_git_mru to object store

2018-02-05 Thread Stefan Beller
From: Jonathan Nieder In a process with multiple repositories open, packfile accessors should be associated to a single repository and not shared globally. Move packed_git and packed_git_mru into the_repository and adjust callers to reflect this. Patch generated by 1.