Hi Eric,
On Thu, 3 May 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > Just like tbdiff, we now show the diff between matching patches. This is
> > a "diff of two diffs", so it can be a bit daunting to read for the
> >
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>> Note: while we now parse diff options such as --color, the effect is not
>> yet the same as in tbdiff, where also the
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Just like tbdiff, we now show the diff between matching patches. This is
> a "diff of two diffs", so it can be a bit daunting to read for the
> beginnger.
s/beginnger/beginner/
> This brings branch-diff
Just like tbdiff, we now show the diff between matching patches. This is
a "diff of two diffs", so it can be a bit daunting to read for the
beginnger.
This brings branch-diff closer to be feature-complete with regard to
tbdiff.
An alternative would be to display an interdiff, i.e. the
4 matches
Mail list logo