Re: [PATCH 09/20] abbrev tests: test for "git-log" behavior

2018-06-09 Thread Martin Ågren
On 9 June 2018 at 11:56, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 09 2018, Martin Ågren wrote: > >> On 9 June 2018 at 00:41, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >>> The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in >>> revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense. >>

Re: [PATCH 09/20] abbrev tests: test for "git-log" behavior

2018-06-09 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Sat, Jun 09 2018, Martin Ågren wrote: > On 9 June 2018 at 00:41, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in >> revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense. > >> +for i in $(test_seq 4 40) > > I've just been skimming so

Re: [PATCH 09/20] abbrev tests: test for "git-log" behavior

2018-06-09 Thread Martin Ågren
On 9 June 2018 at 00:41, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in > revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense. > +for i in $(test_seq 4 40) I've just been skimming so might have missed something, but I see several

[PATCH 09/20] abbrev tests: test for "git-log" behavior

2018-06-08 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason --- t/t0014-abbrev.sh | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t0014-abbrev.sh b/t/t0014-abbrev.sh index