On 9 June 2018 at 11:56, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 09 2018, Martin Ågren wrote:
>
>> On 9 June 2018 at 00:41, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>> The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in
>>> revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense.
>>
On Sat, Jun 09 2018, Martin Ågren wrote:
> On 9 June 2018 at 00:41, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in
>> revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense.
>
>> +for i in $(test_seq 4 40)
>
> I've just been skimming so
On 9 June 2018 at 00:41, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in
> revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense.
> +for i in $(test_seq 4 40)
I've just been skimming so might have missed something, but I see
several
The "log" family of commands does its own parsing for --abbrev in
revision.c, so having dedicated tests for it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
---
t/t0014-abbrev.sh | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/t/t0014-abbrev.sh b/t/t0014-abbrev.sh
index
4 matches
Mail list logo