Jeff King writes:
> Thanks, this writeup makes sense to me. Obviously,
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King
>
> Comparing a slab index versus a util pointer, I think the differences
> should be:
> ...
> So I think the util pointer is strictly better, except for point (2). And
> the main cost is point
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:04:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> From: Jeff King
>
> The "indegree" field in the commit object is only used while sorting
> a list of commits in topological order, and wasting memory otherwise.
>
> We would prefer to shrink the size of individual commit objects,
From: Jeff King
The "indegree" field in the commit object is only used while sorting
a list of commits in topological order, and wasting memory otherwise.
We would prefer to shrink the size of individual commit objects,
which we may have to hold thousands of in-core. We could eject
"indegree" fi
3 matches
Mail list logo