Richard Hansen rhan...@bbn.com writes:
The documentation contains a mix of the two spellings, and including
both makes it possible for users to search the glossary with their
spelling of choice.
Is it an option to instead find dashless form in our documentation
and turn all of them into
On 2013-06-19 13:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Richard Hansen rhan...@bbn.com writes:
The documentation contains a mix of the two spellings, and including
both makes it possible for users to search the glossary with their
spelling of choice.
Is it an option to instead find dashless form in
On 2013-06-19 13:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Richard Hansen rhan...@bbn.com writes:
The documentation contains a mix of the two spellings, and including
both makes it possible for users to search the glossary with their
spelling of choice.
Is it an option to instead find dashless form in
Richard Hansen rhan...@bbn.com writes:
Perhaps something like:
-[[def_tree-ish]]tree-ish::
+[[def_tree-ish]]tree-ish (sometimes misspelled treeish)::
would be satisfactory?
If it is a misspelling, I do not think we need to list both. An
entry tree-ish can be found if you were looking for
The documentation contains a mix of the two spellings, and including
both makes it possible for users to search the glossary with their
spelling of choice.
Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen rhan...@bbn.com
---
Documentation/glossary-content.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
5 matches
Mail list logo
