Re: [PATCH 1/4] t5510: start tracking-ref tests from a known state

2013-05-14 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Jeff King wrote: > We have three sequential tests for for whether tracking refs s/for for/for/ [or] s/for for/for checking/ > are updated by various fetches and pulls; the first two > should not update the ref, and the third should. Each test > depends on the st

[PATCH 1/4] t5510: start tracking-ref tests from a known state

2013-05-11 Thread Jeff King
We have three sequential tests for for whether tracking refs are updated by various fetches and pulls; the first two should not update the ref, and the third should. Each test depends on the state left by the test before. This is fragile (a failing early test will confuse later tests), and means w