On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
None of the callers pass NULL to this function, and there doesn't seem
to be any usefulness to allowing them to do so.
Usually I'd oppose this change, as it seems to be a good defensive
measure. (I cannot assume future
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:52:23PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
None of the callers pass NULL to this function, and there doesn't seem
to be any usefulness to allowing them to do so.
Usually I'd oppose this
None of the callers pass NULL to this function, and there doesn't seem
to be any usefulness to allowing them to do so.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu
---
refs.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index c5fa709..d1130e2 100644
--- a/refs.c
3 matches
Mail list logo