On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 20:06 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:56 AM, David Turner <
> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > > So if we detect an updated file that's not in the index, we are
> > > prepared to invalidate that path, correct? We may invalidate more
> > > than
> > >
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:56 AM, David Turner wrote:
>> So if we detect an updated file that's not in the index, we are
>> prepared to invalidate that path, correct? We may invalidate more
>> than
>> necessary if that's true. Imagine a.o is already ignored. If it's
>>
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 19:31 +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:36 AM, David Turner <
> dtur...@twopensource.com> wrote:
> > static struct watchman_query *make_query(const char *last_update)
> > @@ -60,8 +61,24 @@ static void update_index(struct index_state
> > *istate,
> >
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:36 AM, David Turner wrote:
> static struct watchman_query *make_query(const char *last_update)
> @@ -60,8 +61,24 @@ static void update_index(struct index_state *istate,
> continue;
>
> pos =
DO NOT APPLY THIS
This is a hack to add untracked cache info to the watchman WAMA
extension. The idea is that we don't have to stat directories if
watchman hasn't told us of any changes in those dirs.
If this is the right idea, I can go back and add it to the relevant
patch(es). But I want to
5 matches
Mail list logo