Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:54:12PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> > If we really want to be anal, perhaps a new helper path_exists()
>> > that cares only about existence of paths (i.e. the implementation of
>> > these two helpers they currently have), together with update to
>>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:54:12PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> > If we really want to be anal, perhaps a new helper path_exists()
> > that cares only about existence of paths (i.e. the implementation of
> > these two helpers they currently have), together with update to
> > check the st.st_mode for
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:47:18PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> > Two parts of git-clone's setup logic check whether a
> > directory exists, and they both call stat directly with the
> > same scratch "struct stat" buffer. Let's pull that into a
> > helper, which has a few
Jeff King writes:
> Two parts of git-clone's setup logic check whether a
> directory exists, and they both call stat directly with the
> same scratch "struct stat" buffer. Let's pull that into a
> helper, which has a few advantages:
>
> - it makes the purpose of the stat calls more obvious
>
>
Two parts of git-clone's setup logic check whether a
directory exists, and they both call stat directly with the
same scratch "struct stat" buffer. Let's pull that into a
helper, which has a few advantages:
- it makes the purpose of the stat calls more obvious
- it makes it clear that we don'
5 matches
Mail list logo
