Re: [PATCH 3/4] config doc: elaborate on what transfer.fsckObjects does

On Fri, May 25 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Sunshine writes: > >>> +will instead be left unreferenced in the repository. That's considered >>> +a bug, and hopefully future git release will implement a quarantine >>> +for the "fetch" side as well. >> >> If this was a "BUGS" section in a

Re: [PATCH 3/4] config doc: elaborate on what transfer.fsckObjects does

Eric Sunshine writes: >> +will instead be left unreferenced in the repository. That's considered >> +a bug, and hopefully future git release will implement a quarantine >> +for the "fetch" side as well. > > If this was a "BUGS" section in a man-page, the above might be

Re: [PATCH 3/4] config doc: elaborate on what transfer.fsckObjects does

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > The existing documentation led the user to believe that all we were > doing were basic readability sanity checks, but that hasn't been true > for a very long time. Update the description to match reality, and >

[PATCH 3/4] config doc: elaborate on what transfer.fsckObjects does

The existing documentation led the user to believe that all we were doing were basic readability sanity checks, but that hasn't been true for a very long time. Update the description to match reality, and note the caveat that there's a quarantine for accepting pushes, but not for fetching.