On 11/29/2018 9:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Derrick Stolee writes:
While _eventually_ we should make this opt-out, we shouldn't do that
until it has cooked a while.
I actually do not agree. If the knob gives enough benefit, the
users will learn about it viva voce, and in a few more releases
Derrick Stolee writes:
> You're right that having this hidden as an opt-in config variable
> makes it hard to discover as a typical user.
>
> I would argue that we should actually make the config setting true by
> default, and recommend that servers opt-out. Here are my reasons:
>
> 1. The vast m
On 11/28/2018 5:11 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
+--sparse::
+ Use the "sparse" algorithm to determine which objects to include in
+ the pack. This can have significant performance benefits when computing
+ a pack to send a small change. However, it is possible that extra
+ obj
> +--sparse::
> + Use the "sparse" algorithm to determine which objects to include in
> + the pack. This can have significant performance benefits when
> computing
> + a pack to send a small change. However, it is possible that extra
> + objects are added to the pack-file i
From: Derrick Stolee
Add a '--sparse' option flag to the pack-objects builtin. This
allows the user to specify that they want to use the new logic
for walking trees. This logic currently does not differ from the
existing output, but will in a later change.
Create a new test script, t5322-pack-ob
5 matches
Mail list logo
