Hi,
Jean-Noel Avila wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila
As with the previous patches, this is a good place to put the motivation
for the patch.
> ---
> git-filter-branch.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-filter-branch.sh b/git-filter-branch.sh
> index 2b8cdba15..dd3a605d0 100755
> --- a/git-filter-branch.sh
> +++ b/git-filter-branch.sh
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ git rev-parse --no-flags --revs-only --symbolic-full-name
> \
> sed -e '/^^/d' "$tempdir"/raw-heads >"$tempdir"/heads
>
> test -s "$tempdir"/heads ||
> - die "Which ref do you want to rewrite?"
> + die "You must specify a ref to rewrite"
I find both the old and the new messages pretty uncompelling. The user
got the usage wrong but we don't know what they were trying to do ---
e.g. maybe they specified the ref to rewrite but in the wrong place.
Would e.g. a simple call to 'usage' work?
Thanks,
Jonathan