Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Gábor Szeder writes:
>
> > words[] is just fine, we never modify it after it is filled by
> > _get_comp_words_by_ref() at the very beginning.
>
> Hmph. I would have understood if the latter were "we never look at
> it (to decide what to do)". "we never modify it" does n
Gábor Szeder writes:
> words[] is just fine, we never modify it after it is filled by
> _get_comp_words_by_ref() at the very beginning.
Hmph. I would have understood if the latter were "we never look at
it (to decide what to do)". "we never modify it" does not sound
like an enough justificatio
Hi,
[I'm travelling, so I don't have the means to actually try out this patch, and
it might take a while a to reply to any follow ups.]
On Apr 10, 2014 12:03 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > Some commands need the first word to determine the actual action that is
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras writes:
>
> > Some commands need the first word to determine the actual action that is
> > being executed, however, the command is wrong when we use an alias, for
> > example 'alias.p=push', if we try to complete 'git p origin ', the
> > result would be wr
Felipe Contreras writes:
> Some commands need the first word to determine the actual action that is
> being executed, however, the command is wrong when we use an alias, for
> example 'alias.p=push', if we try to complete 'git p origin ', the
> result would be wrong because __git_complete_remote_
Some commands need the first word to determine the actual action that is
being executed, however, the command is wrong when we use an alias, for
example 'alias.p=push', if we try to complete 'git p origin ', the
result would be wrong because __git_complete_remote_or_refspec() doesn't
know where it
6 matches
Mail list logo
