Hi Peff,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:38:34PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:39 AM Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> > > So let's hear some ideas how to improve the situation, m'kay? Just
> > > as a reminder, this is the problem
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:39 AM Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > So let's hear some ideas how to improve the situation, m'kay? Just as
> > a reminder, this is the problem I want to solve: I want to run the
> > tests in a light-weight manner,
Hi Luke,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Luke Diamand wrote:
> On 5 September 2018 at 13:39, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Luke Diamand wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 September 2018 at 12:09, Johannes Schindelin
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> >> >
>
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 02:38:34PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:39 AM Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > So let's hear some ideas how to improve the situation, m'kay?
> > Just as a reminder, this is the problem I want to solve: I want to run the
> > tests in a
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:39 AM Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> So let's hear some ideas how to improve the situation, m'kay?
> Just as a reminder, this is the problem I want to solve: I want to run the
> tests in a light-weight manner, with minimal output, and only in case of
> an error do I want to
On 5 September 2018 at 13:39, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Luke Diamand wrote:
>
>> On 4 September 2018 at 12:09, Johannes Schindelin
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM Johannes Schindelin via
Hi Luke,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Luke Diamand wrote:
> On 4 September 2018 at 12:09, Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
> >> wrote:
> >> > So let's do something different in
On 4 September 2018 at 12:09, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
>> wrote:
>> > So let's do something different in VSTS: let's run all the tests with
>> > `--quiet` first, and
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
> wrote:
> > So let's do something different in VSTS: let's run all the tests with
> > `--quiet` first, and only if a failure is encountered, try to trace the
> > commands as
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
wrote:
> So let's do something different in VSTS: let's run all the tests with
> `--quiet` first, and only if a failure is encountered, try to trace the
> commands as they are executed. [...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes
From: Johannes Schindelin
The JUnit XML format lends itself to be presented in a powerful UI,
where you can drill down to the information you are interested in very
quickly.
For test failures, this usually means that you want to see the detailed
trace of the failing tests.
With Travis CI, we
11 matches
Mail list logo