On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 05:53 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 10:40 PM, David Turner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> >
> >> +/* A linked list of ref_stores for submodules: */
> >> +static struct ref_store *submodule_ref_stores;
> >
> > I don't
On 04.09.2016 20:53, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 09/04/2016 10:40 PM, David Turner wrote:
>> On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>>
>>> +/* A linked list of ref_stores for submodules: */
>>> +static struct ref_store *submodule_ref_stores;
>>
>> I don't like the per-submodule
On 09/04/2016 10:40 PM, David Turner wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> +/* A linked list of ref_stores for submodules: */
>> +static struct ref_store *submodule_ref_stores;
>
> I don't like the per-submodule stores being in a linked list, which
> requires a
On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:08 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> +/* A linked list of ref_stores for submodules: */
> +static struct ref_store *submodule_ref_stores;
I don't like the per-submodule stores being in a linked list, which
requires a linear search. Stefan has, I think, been doing a bunch
We want ref_stores to be polymorphic, so invent a base class of which
files_ref_store is a derived class. For now there is exactly one
ref_store for the main repository and one for any submodules whose
references have been accessed.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano
-
5 matches
Mail list logo