I suppose this was meant for everyone. Adding back the others.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Holding, Lawrence (NZ)
lawrence.hold...@cubic.com wrote:
Maybe use *argv instead of argv[0]?
Sure. Everywhere? Also in the lines added in patch 17/19 that refer to
both argv[0] and argv[1], such as
Throughout most of parse_args(), the variable 'i' remains at 0. Many
references are still made to the variable even when it could only have
the value 0. This made at least me, who has relatively little
experience with C programming styles, think that parts of the function
was meant to be part of a
2 matches
Mail list logo
