Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] gitk: support -G option from the command line

2013-10-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Rast writes: > I figured this was easier on potential testers. As outlined in the > cover letter, I'll do the splitting and rebasing later. Sorry, I should have read 0/7 before responding, but the message came out of order. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] gitk: support -G option from the command line

2013-10-29 Thread Thomas Rast
Junio C Hamano writes: > Thomas Rast writes: > >> From: Thomas Rast >> >> The -G option's usage is exactly analogous to that of -S, so >> supporting it is easy. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast >> --- >> gitk-git/gitk | 2 +- > > You CC'ed Paul, which is absolutely the right thing to do, but >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] gitk: support -G option from the command line

2013-10-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thomas Rast writes: > From: Thomas Rast > > The -G option's usage is exactly analogous to that of -S, so > supporting it is easy. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast > --- > gitk-git/gitk | 2 +- You CC'ed Paul, which is absolutely the right thing to do, but please make patches against his tree, wh

[PATCH v2 1/7] gitk: support -G option from the command line

2013-10-29 Thread Thomas Rast
From: Thomas Rast The -G option's usage is exactly analogous to that of -S, so supporting it is easy. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast --- gitk-git/gitk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gitk-git/gitk b/gitk-git/gitk index 5cd00d8..0e95814 100755 --- a/gitk-git/gitk