On 11/10/2014 12:47 AM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Some updates from the test lab, Windows 7
"Working" means git update-index --untracked-cache reports Testing...OK
"Rejected" means "..does not change.."
cygwin + NTFS: Working
cygwin + VFAT: Rejected
The same good news for Msysgit, running your github br
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> On 2014-11-08 10.39, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> If the user enables untracked cache, then
>>
>> - move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
>
> How do we detect this move ?
> Shouldn't we be able to detect an unsupported file sys
On 2014-11-08 10.39, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> If the user enables untracked cache, then
>
> - move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
How do we detect this move ?
Shouldn't we be able to detect an unsupported file system
(by probing if stat(root_dir_of_repo) == stat(what_we_have_in_inde
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> --- a/test-dump-untracked-cache.c
>> +++ b/test-dump-untracked-cache.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>> {
>> struct untracked_cache *uc;
>> struct strbuf base = STRBUF_INIT;
>> + setup_git_directory(
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> If the user enables untracked cache, then
>
> - move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
> - or simply upgrade OS
> - or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another
> - or access a shared fs from another machine
>
>
If the user enables untracked cache, then
- move worktree to an unsupported filesystem
- or simply upgrade OS
- or move the whole (portable) disk from one machine to another
- or access a shared fs from another machine
there's no guarantee that untracked cache can still function properly.
Rec
6 matches
Mail list logo
