> I don't understand about the ">= 0". What should I replace it with?
> Maybe you mean the return is never positive so I can change:
>
> parse_tree_gently(tree, 1) >= 0
>
> to:
> !parse_tree_gently(tree, 1)
>
> ?
Sorry for the lack of clarity - that is what I meant.
> > The missing mechanism
Resending this in plain-text mode so that git@vger.kernel.org won't
bounce it. Sorry for those of you receiving this twice.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:20 AM Jonathan Tan wrote:
>
> > In list-objects.c we no longer print a message to stderr if a tree
> > object is missing (quiet_on_missing is
> In list-objects.c we no longer print a message to stderr if a tree
> object is missing (quiet_on_missing is always true). I couldn't find
> any place where this would matter, or where the caller of
> traverse_commit_list would need to be fixed to show the error. However,
> in the future it would
Previously, we assumed only blob objects could be missing. This patch
makes rev-list handle missing trees like missing blobs. A missing tree
will cause an error if --missing indicates an error should be caused,
and the hash is printed even if the tree is missing.
In list-objects.c we no longer
4 matches
Mail list logo
