Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] filter-branch: support for incremental update + fix for ancient tag format

Ian Campbell writes: > Travis is happy and the dt reconvert looks sensible (only took 60 hours > ;-)). Good. > Don't know if this is useful to your workflow but: > > The following changes since commit 4384e3cde2ce8ecd194202e171ae16333d241326: > >   Git 2.14 (2017-08-04

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] filter-branch: support for incremental update + fix for ancient tag format

On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 13:42 +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ian Campbell writes: > > > This is the third version of my patches to add incremental support to > > git-filter-branch. Since the last time I have replaced `git mktag -- > > allow-missing-tagger` with `git

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] filter-branch: support for incremental update + fix for ancient tag format

Ian Campbell writes: > This is the third version of my patches to add incremental support to > git-filter-branch. Since the last time I have replaced `git mktag -- > allow-missing-tagger` with `git hash-object -t tag -w --stdin`. > > I've force pushed to [1] (Travis is still

[PATCH v3 0/4] filter-branch: support for incremental update + fix for ancient tag format

This is the third version of my patches to add incremental support to git-filter-branch. Since the last time I have replaced `git mktag -- allow-missing-tagger` with `git hash-object -t tag -w --stdin`. I've force pushed to [1] (Travis is still running) and have set off the process of