On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
>> On second thought, why hold patches back, lengthen the worktree-move
>> series and make it a pain to review? I moved a few patches from
>> worktree-move into this series and I
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On second thought, why hold patches back, lengthen the worktree-move
> series and make it a pain to review? I moved a few patches from
> worktree-move into this series and I took two other out to create
> nd/error-errno. So I'm going to take more patches
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On second thought, why hold patches back, lengthen the worktree-move
> series and make it a pain to review? I moved a few patches from
> worktree-move into this series and I took two other out to create
> nd/error-errno. So I'm going to take more patches
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:21:05PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> > Similarly, it looks like 'path' doesn't need to be a strbuf at all
> > since the result of absolute_path() should remain valid long enough
> > for fspathcmp(). It could just be:
> >
> > const char *path = absolute_path(...);
> >
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> ---
>> diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
>> @@ -147,6 +150,25 @@
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
> @@ -147,6 +150,25 @@ done:
> +static void mark_current_worktree(struct worktree **worktrees)
> +{
> +
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
worktree.c | 24
worktree.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/worktree.c b/worktree.c
index 360ba41..dc092a7 100644
--- a/worktree.c
+++ b/worktree.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#include "refs.h"
7 matches
Mail list logo