Jean-Noël AVILA writes:
>> ... Doesn't that workflow apply equally well for the
>> documentation l10n?
>
> Theoretically, this workflow should apply to the documentation, so that a
> version of the documentation can be cut at each release of git. I still have
> to convince po4a not to update t
Le dimanche 26 mars 2017, 15:56:55 CEST Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Jean-Noël AVILA writes:
> > ... So I would
> > think the other way around: for those interested in translated the
> > documentation, some script would allow to checkout the git project inside
> > the gitman-l10n project (like a kin
Jean-Noël AVILA writes:
> ... So I would
> think the other way around: for those interested in translated the
> documentation, some script would allow to checkout the git project inside the
> gitman-l10n project (like a kind of library).
>
> This would be mainly transparent for the git develop
Le mercredi 22 mars 2017 11:02:09 CET, vous avez écrit :
> Jean-Noël Avila writes:
> >> I am wondering if Documentation/po part should be a separate
> >> repository, with a dedicated i18n/l10n coordinator. Would it make
> >> it easier for (1) those who write code and doc without knowing other
> >
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> But more importantly, aren't we essentially adding an equivalent of
>>
>> cd Documentation && cat git-*.txt
>>
>> to our codebase?
>>
>> Surely we cannot avoid having a copy of all messages that
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> But more importantly, aren't we essentially adding an equivalent of
>
> cd Documentation && cat git-*.txt
>
> to our codebase?
>
> Surely we cannot avoid having a copy of all messages that are to be
> translated using msgid/msgstr b
Stefan Beller venit, vidit, dixit 22.03.2017 19:59:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> So we'd want to be able to say:
>>> "get a tarball including all submodules except the superproject"
>>> (This would produce the "optional language pack tarball")
>>
>> You do not
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> So we'd want to be able to say:
>> "get a tarball including all submodules except the superproject"
>> (This would produce the "optional language pack tarball")
>
> You do not need that. Just go to the gitman-l10n project and grab a
>
Stefan Beller writes:
> I wonder if we could have partial functionality for these "clone and checkout"
> fake submodules, by having e.g. the .gitmodules file telling you the URL
> and path, but no recorded gitlink in the tree.
You can have such a comment in any file including .gitmodules but
wou
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jean-Noël Avila writes:
>
>>> I am wondering if Documentation/po part should be a separate
>>> repository, with a dedicated i18n/l10n coordinator. Would it make
>>> it easier for (1) those who write code and doc without knowing other
>>>
Jean-Noël Avila writes:
>> I am wondering if Documentation/po part should be a separate
>> repository, with a dedicated i18n/l10n coordinator. Would it make
>> it easier for (1) those who write code and doc without knowing other
>> languages, (2) those who update .pot and coordinate the l10n eff
Le 20/03/2017 à 23:05, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> Jean-Noel Avila writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila
>> ---
>> Documentation/po/documentation.fr.po | 1095
>> ++
>> Documentation/po/documentation.pot | 787
>> 2 files changed,
Jean-Noel Avila writes:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila
> ---
> Documentation/po/documentation.fr.po | 1095
> ++
> Documentation/po/documentation.pot | 787
> 2 files changed, 1882 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/p
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila
---
Documentation/po/documentation.fr.po | 1095 ++
Documentation/po/documentation.pot | 787
2 files changed, 1882 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/po/documentation.fr.po
create mode 100644
14 matches
Mail list logo