Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pack-objects: do not get distracted by broken symrefs

2015-10-08 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On 2015-10-07 19:45, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> It is quite possible for, say, a remote HEAD to become broken, e.g. >> when the default branch was renamed. >> >> We should still be able to pack our objects when such a thing

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pack-objects: do not get distracted by broken symrefs

2015-10-08 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Junio, On 2015-10-08 21:42, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > >> Would yo kindly add the line >> >> This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/423 >> >> before the Signed-off-by lines? > > Oh, sorry, I missed that one.

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pack-objects: do not get distracted by broken symrefs

2015-10-08 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > Would yo kindly add the line > > This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/423 > > before the Signed-off-by lines? Oh, sorry, I missed that one. Fixed. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pack-objects: do not get distracted by broken symrefs

2015-10-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin writes: > It is quite possible for, say, a remote HEAD to become broken, e.g. > when the default branch was renamed. > > We should still be able to pack our objects when such a thing happens; > simply ignore broken symrefs (because they cannot

[PATCH v3 2/2] pack-objects: do not get distracted by broken symrefs

2015-10-06 Thread Johannes Schindelin
It is quite possible for, say, a remote HEAD to become broken, e.g. when the default branch was renamed. We should still be able to pack our objects when such a thing happens; simply ignore broken symrefs (because they cannot matter for the packing process anyway). This fixes