tanay abhra writes:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Junio C Hamano writes:
>>
>> >> +found = skip_prefix(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
>> >> +if(!found) {
>>
>> Missing SP between the control keyword and parenthesized expression
>>
Junio C Hamano pobox.com> writes:
>
> Junio C Hamano pobox.com> writes:
>
> >> + found = skip_prefix(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
> >> + if(!found) {
>
> Missing SP between the control keyword and parenthesized expression
> the keyword uses.
>
> I've fixed this (
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> +found = skip_prefix(buf, sigcheck_gpg_status[i].check + 1);
>> +if(!found) {
Missing SP between the control keyword and parenthesized expression
the keyword uses.
I've fixed this (and the broken indentation) locally and queued the
result to 'pu
Tanay Abhra writes:
> In record_author_date() & parse_gpg_output(), the callers of
> starts_with() not just want to know if the string starts with the
> prefix, but also can benefit from knowing the string that follows
> the prefix.
>
> By using skip_prefix(), we can do both at the same time.
>
>
In record_author_date() & parse_gpg_output(), the callers of
starts_with() not just want to know if the string starts with the
prefix, but also can benefit from knowing the string that follows
the prefix.
By using skip_prefix(), we can do both at the same time.
Helped-by: Max Horn
Helped-by: Jun
5 matches
Mail list logo