Am 30.11.2012 04:27, schrieb W. Trevor King:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
But I really don't want to figure out how to handle
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
[snip initial thoughts leading to the update --remote v5]
I was thinking the same thing, but reading this whole thread a couple of
weeks late. Thanks for
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
[snip initial thoughts leading to the update --remote v5]
I was thinking the same
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:11:20PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:13 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 01:29:12PM -0500, Phil Hord wrote:
For that reason, I don't like the --pull switch since it implies a
fetch, but I will not always want
From: W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:53:34AM -0500, W. Trevor King wrote:
I thought of a better idea on the train. How about adding `--remote`
to `submodule update` that overrides the gitlinked SHA-1 with the
SHA-1 for origin/$branch? All of the other
5 matches
Mail list logo
