Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] pkt-line: add packet_write_gently()

2016-09-12 Thread Junio C Hamano
larsxschnei...@gmail.com writes:

> +int packet_write_gently(const int fd_out, const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> + static char packet_write_buffer[LARGE_PACKET_MAX];
> +
> + if (size > sizeof(packet_write_buffer) - 4) {
> + error("packet write failed");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + packet_trace(buf, size, 1);
> + size += 4;
> + set_packet_header(packet_write_buffer, size);
> + memcpy(packet_write_buffer + 4, buf, size - 4);
> + if (write_in_full(fd_out, packet_write_buffer, size) == size)
> + return 0;
> +
> + error("packet write failed");
> + return -1;
> +}

The same comment as 4/10 applies here.


Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] pkt-line: add packet_write_gently()

2016-09-11 Thread Lars Schneider

> On 08 Sep 2016, at 23:24, Stefan Beller  wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:21 AM,   wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Add packet_write_gently() which writes arbitrary data and returns `0`
>> for success and `-1` for an error.
> 
> I think documenting the return code is better done in either the header file
> or in a commend preceding the implementation instead of the commit message?
> 
> Maybe just a generic comment for *_gently is good enough, maybe even no
> comment. So the commit is fine, too. I dunno.

I agree that this is too verbose as this function follows the standard
Git return value conventions (AFAIK). I'll remove this from all commit
messages.


>> This function is used by other
>> pkt-line functions in a subsequent patch.
> 
> That's what I figured. Do we also need to mention that in the preceding patch
> for packet_flush_gently ?

I'll add this note to all commit messages that introduce new functions which
are used later.


Thanks,
Lars

Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] pkt-line: add packet_write_gently()

2016-09-08 Thread Stefan Beller
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:21 AM,   wrote:
> From: Lars Schneider 
>
> packet_write_fmt_gently() uses format_packet() which lets the caller
> only send string data via "%s". That means it cannot be used for
> arbitrary data that may contain NULs.

Makes sense.

>
> Add packet_write_gently() which writes arbitrary data and returns `0`
> for success and `-1` for an error.

I think documenting the return code is better done in either the header file
or in a commend preceding the implementation instead of the commit message?

Maybe just a generic comment for *_gently is good enough, maybe even no
comment. So the commit is fine, too. I dunno.


> This function is used by other
> pkt-line functions in a subsequent patch.

That's what I figured. Do we also need to mention that in the preceding patch
for packet_flush_gently ?

>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider 
> ---
>  pkt-line.c | 19 +++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/pkt-line.c b/pkt-line.c
> index 37345ca..1d3d725 100644
> --- a/pkt-line.c
> +++ b/pkt-line.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,25 @@ int packet_write_fmt_gently(int fd, const char *fmt, ...)
> return status;
>  }
>
> +int packet_write_gently(const int fd_out, const char *buf, size_t size)
> +{
> +   static char packet_write_buffer[LARGE_PACKET_MAX];
> +
> +   if (size > sizeof(packet_write_buffer) - 4) {
> +   error("packet write failed");
> +   return -1;
> +   }
> +   packet_trace(buf, size, 1);
> +   size += 4;
> +   set_packet_header(packet_write_buffer, size);
> +   memcpy(packet_write_buffer + 4, buf, size - 4);
> +   if (write_in_full(fd_out, packet_write_buffer, size) == size)
> +   return 0;
> +
> +   error("packet write failed");
> +   return -1;
> +}
> +
>  void packet_buf_write(struct strbuf *buf, const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
> va_list args;
> --
> 2.10.0
>


[PATCH v7 05/10] pkt-line: add packet_write_gently()

2016-09-08 Thread larsxschneider
From: Lars Schneider 

packet_write_fmt_gently() uses format_packet() which lets the caller
only send string data via "%s". That means it cannot be used for
arbitrary data that may contain NULs.

Add packet_write_gently() which writes arbitrary data and returns `0`
for success and `-1` for an error. This function is used by other
pkt-line functions in a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider 
---
 pkt-line.c | 19 +++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/pkt-line.c b/pkt-line.c
index 37345ca..1d3d725 100644
--- a/pkt-line.c
+++ b/pkt-line.c
@@ -181,6 +181,25 @@ int packet_write_fmt_gently(int fd, const char *fmt, ...)
return status;
 }
 
+int packet_write_gently(const int fd_out, const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+   static char packet_write_buffer[LARGE_PACKET_MAX];
+
+   if (size > sizeof(packet_write_buffer) - 4) {
+   error("packet write failed");
+   return -1;
+   }
+   packet_trace(buf, size, 1);
+   size += 4;
+   set_packet_header(packet_write_buffer, size);
+   memcpy(packet_write_buffer + 4, buf, size - 4);
+   if (write_in_full(fd_out, packet_write_buffer, size) == size)
+   return 0;
+
+   error("packet write failed");
+   return -1;
+}
+
 void packet_buf_write(struct strbuf *buf, const char *fmt, ...)
 {
va_list args;
-- 
2.10.0