Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I tried a more generic approach a while ago.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/188705
Looks good. Why didn't you polish it for inclusion?
It's a very useful feature in my opinion: the default git branch
output is quite horrible. I want to make sort,
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phil Hord writes:
>
>> I imagine it with --date-order and whatnot.
>
> Perhaps modeled after this one.
>
> git for-each-ref \
> --format='%(refname:short) %(subject)'
> --sort='-committerdate' refs/heads/
>
Nice. I had
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Uses commit->date to sort displayed refs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
> ---
> Just had this idea and wrote it down in five minutes. The
> implementation is only meant to be indicative.
>
> Isn't this awesome?
I tried
Phil Hord writes:
> I imagine it with --date-order and whatnot.
Perhaps modeled after this one.
git for-each-ref \
--format='%(refname:short) %(subject)'
--sort='-committerdate' refs/heads/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a m
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Uses commit->date to sort displayed refs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
> ---
I dig it.
I imagine it with --date-order and whatnot. But I might like it even
better if it were reverse-sorted. Maybe it needs -rt for that.
Uses commit->date to sort displayed refs.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra
---
Just had this idea and wrote it down in five minutes. The
implementation is only meant to be indicative.
Isn't this awesome?
builtin/branch.c | 32 +---
1 file changed, 29 insertio
6 matches
Mail list logo
