Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
* Here is what I am at the moment; I cannot quite explain (hence I
cannot convince myself) why this is the right solution, but it
seems to make the above sample case work without breaking any
existing tests. It is possible that the tests
When a commit creates new file B by copying the contents of an
existing file A and making a small edit and makes large edit to A,
diff -M would not see any copying or renaming, because the file A
appears in both preimage and postimage. The output ends up showing
two large patches, one that adds
On 01.02.2015 19:18, Junio C Hamano wrote:
When a commit creates new file B by copying the contents of an
existing file A and making a small edit and makes large edit to A,
This part is hard to parse
When ... and making a small edit and makes a large edit
So large or small? It's a bit hard to
A1 = I am file A.
B1 is copied from A1, so B1 = I am file A.
B1 changes to B2 = I am file B.
A1 changes to A2 = file A is changed a lot, a lot, ..., a lot.
At this moment, commit A2 and B2 files.
--
View this message in context:
4 matches
Mail list logo
