Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-28 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote: Which SVN version are you using?  I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M (on a 32-bit

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote: 0006 is insufficient and incompatible with older SVN. I pushed git-svn: reload RA every log-window-size (commit dfa72fdb96befbd790f623bb2909a347176753c2) instead which saves much more memory: it

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Eric Wong
Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote: Which SVN version are you using? I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M (on a 32-bit system). git-svn hit 45M and took 11:44 to finish. My

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
-- On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 06:38 GMT Eric Wong wrote: Which SVN version are you using?  I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process beyond 40M (on a 32-bit system). I also

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-27 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
-- On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 16:56 GMT Eric Wong wrote: Eric Wong normalper...@yhbt.net wrote: Which SVN version are you using?  I'm cloning (currently on r373xx) https://svn.r-project.org/R using --stdlayout and unable to see memory growth of the git-svn Perl process

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-25 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: 0006-git-svn-clear-global-SVN-pool-between-get_log-invoca.patch 0006 is insufficient and incompatible with older SVN. I pushed git-svn:

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-25 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
-- On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 00:34 BST Eric Wong wrote: Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years and run git svn fetch --all every few days. So that's the old clone. Since this discussion started, I

Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-24 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years and run git svn fetch --all every few days. So that's the old clone. Since this discussion started, I made a new one with git 2.1.0 patched with the first two patches below, a couple of weeks ago. And I ran 'git svn fetch --all' on both

Re: Anomaly with the new code - Re: git-svn performance

2014-10-24 Thread Eric Wong
Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: I keep tabs of a particular svn repository over many years and run git svn fetch --all every few days. So that's the old clone. Since this discussion started, I made a new one with git 2.1.0 patched with the first two patches below, a couple of