David,
Option C - when you say "[in git-cola] when the remote branch is
selected it strips of the remote part and automatically fills in the
name field with that", are you referring to the Branch Create screen
or the Branch Checkout screen? Your description matches the Create
screen. And for
Junio,
I can appreciate the amount of clutter you'd get with the ancient
behavior. That said, I'd be willing to live with it. I personally
prefer to see all the branches coming and going - if the branches are
good enough for upstream, they're good enough for me (I'm really good
an ignoring
John Medema writes:
> Option D has the downside that it changes the behavior of more code
> (cmdline and gui), which is why I didn't suggest it before. It also
> has the downside of making the branch list longer. But that's the
> nature of cloning; if I copy a full
Git gurus, throw this one on your to-do list:
This is a feature request to enhance the Git GUI to make it easier to
checkout non-existing branches that exist upstream. Apologies if this
is not the correct place for feature requests.
Scenario: Upstream repo has 4 branches - master, develop,
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:08:24AM -0700, John Medema wrote:
> Git gurus, throw this one on your to-do list:
>
> This is a feature request to enhance the Git GUI to make it easier to
> checkout non-existing branches that exist upstream. Apologies if this
> is not the correct place for feature
5 matches
Mail list logo