Re: Feature request: git rebase --no-edit --continue

2016-12-22 Thread Daniel Chumak

Uff, I forgot about the CC of my last reply.


Why not

git commit -C HEAD && git rebase --continue

?

Ciao,
Johannes
Thanks this is a cleaner solution. I guess because I was too fixed upon 
knowing of the existence of the no-edit option from other git commands 
that I forget about this, even though I am using it quite often.


Re: Feature request: git rebase --no-edit --continue

2016-12-22 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Daniel,

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, Daniel Chumak wrote:

> Is there a reason why there is no '--no-edit' option for git rebase? I would
> like to use this option after editing a commit and continuing the current
> interactive rebase without having to change the commit message.

Why not

git commit -C HEAD && git rebase --continue

?

Ciao,
Johannes


Re: Feature request: git rebase --no-edit --continue

2016-12-22 Thread Stefan Beller
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Chumak
 wrote:
> Is there a reason why there is no '--no-edit' option for git rebase?

Nobody added it so far.

> I would
> like to use this option after editing a commit and continuing the current
> interactive rebase without having to change the commit message.
>

You're welcome to write a patch for it. :)

On the other hand you could just use
EDITOR=true git rebase --continue


Feature request: git rebase --no-edit --continue

2016-12-22 Thread Daniel Chumak
Is there a reason why there is no '--no-edit' option for git rebase? I 
would like to use this option after editing a commit and continuing the 
current interactive rebase without having to change the commit message.