On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 09:16 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
On 2015-04-04 02.24, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 15:01 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
Why is it impossible to free struct lock_files? I understand that they
become
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 15:01 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
Why is it impossible to free struct lock_files? I understand that they
become part of a linked list, and that there's an atexit handler that
goes over that list. But couldn't we just
On 2015-04-04 02.24, David Turner wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 15:01 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
Why is it impossible to free struct lock_files? I understand that they
become part of a linked list, and that there's an atexit handler that
goes
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:24:43PM -0400, David Turner wrote:
But I can see why git wouldn't want to depend on that behavior. C11 has
a way to do this safely, but AIUI, git doesn't want to move to C99 let
alone C11. So I guess this will just have to remain the way it is.
I would really like
David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
Why is it impossible to free struct lock_files? I understand that they
become part of a linked list, and that there's an atexit handler that
goes over that list. But couldn't we just remove them from the linked
list and then free them?
I
Why is it impossible to free struct lock_files? I understand that they
become part of a linked list, and that there's an atexit handler that
goes over that list. But couldn't we just remove them from the linked
list and then free them? Even if we couldn't free all lock_files, maybe
we could
On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 15:01 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
David Turner dtur...@twopensource.com writes:
Why is it impossible to free struct lock_files? I understand that they
become part of a linked list, and that there's an atexit handler that
goes over that list. But couldn't we just
7 matches
Mail list logo
