On Fri, Sep 28 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>>> That said, that seems to me like a lot of work to avoid adding some
>>> patches to "next" that belong in "next" anyway. I understand why the
>>> Git for Windows main
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:57:11PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Another way to look at it, which is closer to what I was thinking about,
> is to just view GFW as some alternate universe "next" branch (which by
> my count is ~2-3k commits ahead of master[1]).
> 1. $ git log --max-parents
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> That said, that seems to me like a lot of work to avoid adding some
>> patches to "next" that belong in "next" anyway. I understand why the
>> Git for Windows maintainer does not always have time to upstream
>> prompt
On Thu, Sep 27 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> So it's similar to various packages that have "alternates" and are semi
>> or permanently forked, like emacs & xemacs, JDK etc., although I can't
>> recall one offhand that's quite similar to GFW v.s. git.g
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 6:24 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> My only stake in this is I thought it would be neat to be able to "apt
> install git-for-windows",
That's what private builds are for (or "PPA" if debian has an
equivalent). I already largely ignore any Windows reports because I
don
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> So it's similar to various packages that have "alternates" and are semi
> or permanently forked, like emacs & xemacs, JDK etc., although I can't
> recall one offhand that's quite similar to GFW v.s. git.git.
>
> My only stake in this is I thought it would be n
On Thu, Sep 27 2018, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
>> GFW is a "friendly fork", but a permanent one it seems. The diff between
>> it and 2.19.0 proper is ~10k lines, and e.g. this last release had
>> experimental stash/rebase in C that 2.19.0 didn't.
>>
>> So it would
On 9/27/2018 12:01 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I had an IRC conversation with Johannes saying I didn't know Git For
Windows builds perfectly well for Linux, this just isn't advertised in
the ANNOUNCE E-Mails, so I hadn't tried.
We run CI to ensure it builds and tests on Mac OSX, too. Thi
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> GFW is a "friendly fork", but a permanent one it seems. The diff between
> it and 2.19.0 proper is ~10k lines, and e.g. this last release had
> experimental stash/rebase in C that 2.19.0 didn't.
>
> So it would be great if this were packaged up by linux distro as s
I had an IRC conversation with Johannes saying I didn't know Git For
Windows builds perfectly well for Linux, this just isn't advertised in
the ANNOUNCE E-Mails, so I hadn't tried.
Johannes doesn't build his own tarballs, but these are provided at:
https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/tags diffi
10 matches
Mail list logo