On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Yes. I'm not opposed to yours, I was just opposed to some of the things
> around it you did, so I wrote mine as a kind of place-holder. I'll happily
> take patches to turn it from a rally simple and stupid one into a more
> polished version.
Btw
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Yes. I'm not opposed to yours, I was just opposed to some of the things
> > around it you did, so I wrote mine as a kind of place-holder. I'll happily
> > take patches to turn it from a rally simple
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
>
> Yours reads the whole commit history; I intentionally wrote mine to
> only read as far back as turns out to be necessary.
Yes. I'm not opposed to yours, I was just opposed to some of the things
around it you did, so I wrote mine as a kind of plac
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > Someone started the avalanche by adding date to the structure. Of
> > course, date is smaller, but it leads people (including me) out of the
> > way.
>
> Yeah, the naming and the structure comes from "re
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> Someone started the avalanche by adding date to the structure. Of
> course, date is smaller, but it leads people (including me) out of the
> way.
Yeah, the naming and the structure comes from "rev-tree.c", so there's a
bit of historical baggage alrea
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> >
> > --- 45f926575d2c44072bfcf2317dbf3f0fbb513a4e/revision.h (mode:100644
> > sha1:28d0de3261a61f68e4e0948a25a416a515cd2e83)
> > +++ 37a0b01b85c2999243674d48bfc71cdba0e5518e/revision.h (mode:100644
> >
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:18:47PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> >
> > --- 45f926575d2c44072bfcf2317dbf3f0fbb513a4e/revision.h (mode:100644
> > sha1:28d0de3261a61f68e4e0948a25a416a515
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
>
> --- 45f926575d2c44072bfcf2317dbf3f0fbb513a4e/revision.h (mode:100644
> sha1:28d0de3261a61f68e4e0948a25a416a515cd2e83)
> +++ 37a0b01b85c2999243674d48bfc71cdba0e5518e/revision.h (mode:100644
> sha1:523bde6e14e18bb0ecbded8f83ad4df93fc467ab)
> @@ -2
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 05:24:20PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > This adds support to revision.h for parsing commit records (but not going
> > any further than parsing a single record). Som
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 05:24:20PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> This adds support to revision.h for parsing commit records (but not going
> any further than parsing a single record). Something like this is needed
> by anything that use
This adds support to revision.h for parsing commit records (but not going
any further than parsing a single record). Something like this is needed
by anything that uses revision.h, but older programs open-code it.
Signed-Off-By: Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: revision.h
===
11 matches
Mail list logo