Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Jeff Hostetler writes: > Sorry, $DAYJOB got in the way (again). > > This is still on my short-list of things to take care of. > I should have something for you next week. That's perfectly OK. I just wanted a newer articule in my newsreader I can bookmark so that

RE: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Sorry, $DAYJOB got in the way (again). This is still on my short-list of things to take care of. I should have something for you next week. Thanks again, Jeff -Original Message- From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 4:12 PM To: Jeff Hostetler

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Jeff Hostetler writes: > On 2/14/2017 5:03 PM, Jeff King wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> >>> On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and >>> istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Jeff Hostetler writes: >> But the other Jeff sounded like a follow-up was to follow shortly if >> not imminent so I decided to allocate my time on other topics still >> only on the list first while waiting to see what happens. > > Sorry, I was out of the office for

RE: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:jch2...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Junio C Hamano > Jeff King writes: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote: >> >>> I have some informal numbers in a spreadsheet. I was seeing >>> a 8-9% speed up on a status on my gigantic

RE: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

> Jeff King writes: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:58:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >>> Jeff Hostetler writes: >>> >>> > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better >>> > demonstrate this. >>> >>> I didn't pick up the series while

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:58:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Jeff Hostetler writes: >> >> > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better >> > demonstrate this. >> >> I didn't pick up the series while watching

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 09:58:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff Hostetler writes: > > > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better > > demonstrate this. > > I didn't pick up the series while watching these exchanges, as I > didn't know how quick

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Jeff Hostetler writes: > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better > demonstrate this. I didn't pick up the series while watching these exchanges, as I didn't know how quick your turnaround would be, but now a few days have passed. Just to make sure we

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

Jeff King writes: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > >> I have some informal numbers in a spreadsheet. I was seeing >> a 8-9% speed up on a status on my gigantic repo. >> >> I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better >>

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:27:53AM -0500, Jeff Hostetler wrote: > I have some informal numbers in a spreadsheet. I was seeing > a 8-9% speed up on a status on my gigantic repo. > > I'll try to put together a before/after perf-test to better > demonstrate this. Thanks. What I'm mostly curious

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

On 2/14/2017 5:03 PM, Jeff King wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on very large repositories. This series of changes reduces the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] A series of performance enhancements in the memihash and name-cache area

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Windows, calls to memihash() and maintaining the istate.name_hash and > istate.dir_hash HashMaps take significant time on very large > repositories. This series of changes reduces the overall time taken for > various