On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>> [This is sent from Thunderbird news, so it should be all right]
>
> This is fine, the other one was broken. Out of curiosity what's the
> difference between Thunderbird email and news
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> On 2015-06-18 at 23:25, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> [...]
> > > One could imagine some frankly, quite rare example where t
On 2015-06-18 at 23:25, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
[...]
>> One could imagine some frankly, quite rare example where there is a
>> team of people who votes on each commit before it gets
On 2015-06-19 at 06:25, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
>> Author and committer include datetime in the contents of the
>> field, which is used by Git for heuristics limiting walk. Coauthor
>> would have the same date as author, isn't it? If, after
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> Author and committer include datetime in the contents of the
> field, which is used by Git for heuristics limiting walk. Coauthor
> would have the same date as author, isn't it? If, after long
> and involved discussion, we didn't ad
Junio C Hamano wrote:
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
Author and committer are used by many git tools; if they weren't part of
the object header, they'd need to be part of some pseudo-header with a
standardized format that git can parse.
Yes, the same goes to the address on Signed-off-by: foote
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> >
> > By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
> > primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary
> > at all. I sometimes deliberately o
> -Original Message-
> From: Theodore Ts'o
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 6:52 PM
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> >
> > By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
> > primary author, as in such situations usually there is no
> p
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 06:52:24PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> >
> > By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
> > primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary at
> > all. I sometimes delib
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>
> By allowing multiple authors, you don't have to decide who's the
> primary author, as in such situations usually there is no primary at
> all. I sometimes deliberately override the author when committing and
> add myself just as anot
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
> Author and committer are used by many git tools; if they weren't part of
> the object header, they'd need to be part of some pseudo-header with a
> standardized format that git can parse.
Yes, the same goes to the address on Signed-off-by: footers. There
recently
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:51:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
>
> > Having more than one author field in a commit would likely break things,
> > but having a coauthor field seems plausible these days. Git added
> > support for signed commits, and the world didn't
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
>
> > Having more than one author field in a commit would likely break
> > things, but having a coauthor field seems plausible these days.
> > Git added support for signed commits, and the world didn't end, so
>
j...@joshtriplett.org writes:
> Having more than one author field in a commit would likely break things,
> but having a coauthor field seems plausible these days. Git added
> support for signed commits, and the world didn't end, so it's possible
> to extend the commit format.
Something being pos
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:57:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Tuncer Ayaz writes:
> >>
> >> > Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
> >> > implemented,
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > Junio, th
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:26:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Tuncer Ayaz writes:
> >
> > > Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
> > > implemented,
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Junio, thanks for the quick response.
>
> I supp
Tuncer Ayaz writes:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Tuncer Ayaz writes:
>>
>> > Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
>> > implemented,
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Junio, thanks for the quick response.
>
> I suppose things have changed since Jonathan Nieder's
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Tuncer Ayaz writes:
>
> > Is this something that breaks the design and would never be
> > implemented,
>
> Yes.
Junio, thanks for the quick response.
I suppose things have changed since Jonathan Nieder's response in [1]
(2010), or I've rea
Tuncer Ayaz writes:
> Is this something that breaks the design and would never be implemented,
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
