On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:52:53PM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> > One data point indicating this is giving issues is that today on IRC a
> > user was confused why `git checkout pt` did not show any message and did
> > not
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> One data point indicating this is giving issues is that today on IRC a
> user was confused why `git checkout pt` did not show any message and did
> not checkout a remote branch called 'pt' as they expected. It turned out
>
Duy Nguyen writes:
>
> I would like an option to revert back to current behavior. I'm not a
> new user. I know what I'm doing. Please don't make me type more.
I can guarantee that nobody will stay a newbie. They either become
more proficient and aware of what they are doing
From: "Dannier Castro L"
On 13/05/2018 00:03, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Dannier Castro L
wrote:
For GIT new users, this complicated versatility of could
be very confused, also considering that actually the flag '--' is
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 08:23:32PM -0600, Dannier Castro L wrote:
> Currently, is a complex command able to handle both
> branches and files without any distintion other than their names,
> taking into account that depending on the type (branch or file),
> the functionality is completely
> On 13/05/2018 00:03, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Dannier Castro L
> > wrote:
> >> For GIT new users, this complicated versatility of could
> >> be very confused, also considering that actually the flag '--' is
> >> completely useless (added
On 13/05/2018 00:03, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Dannier Castro L wrote:
For GIT new users, this complicated versatility of could
be very confused, also considering that actually the flag '--' is
completely useless (added or not, there is not any
"Dannier Castro L" wrote:
> Currently, is a complex command able to handle both
> branches and files without any distintion other than their names,
> taking into account that depending on the type (branch or file),
> the functionality is completely different, the easier
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Dannier Castro L wrote:
> Currently, is a complex command able to handle both
> branches and files without any distintion other than their names,
> taking into account that depending on the type (branch or file),
> the functionality is
9 matches
Mail list logo