Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote:
> > Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Jeff King wrote:
>
> >>> I guess I just wonder if I set up a mirror on another domain, would
> >>> anybody actually _use_ it? I'd think most people would just go to
> >>> public-inbox.org as the de facto URL.
> >>
> >> If
Eric Wong wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Jeff King wrote:
>>> I guess I just wonder if I set up a mirror on another domain, would
>>> anybody actually _use_ it? I'd think most people would just go to
>>> public-inbox.org as the de facto URL.
>>
>> If it's faster than public-inbox.org and you
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:20:49AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > At the very least, I think if we plan to reference without an http URL
> > that we would use something like URI-ish, like . That gives
> > tools a better chance to say "OK, I know how to find message-ids"
> > (though I still think that
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
>
> > I guess I just wonder if I set up a mirror on another domain, would
> > anybody actually _use_ it? I'd think most people would just go to
> > public-inbox.org as the de facto URL.
>
> If it's faster than public-inbox.org and you don't mind the traf
Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:02:43AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Anyways I hope to teach public-inbox to auto-linkify Message-ID-looking
> > strings "" into URLs for domain-portability,
> > (but it's ambiguous with email addresses). But yeah, I don't
> > like things being tied to
Jeff King wrote:
> I guess I just wonder if I set up a mirror on another domain, would
> anybody actually _use_ it? I'd think most people would just go to
> public-inbox.org as the de facto URL.
If it's faster than public-inbox.org and you don't mind the traffic I
would send, then I'll use it. :)
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:02:43AM +, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
> > I've thought about mirroring it to a public server as well, just for
> > redundancy. But without the same domain, I'm not sure it would be all
> > that useful as a community resource.
>
> I wouldn't get too attache
On Wed, Aug 29 2018, Andrei Rybak wrote:
> On 2018-08-29 12:02, Eric Wong wrote:
>> Anyways I hope to teach public-inbox to auto-linkify Message-ID-looking
>> strings "" into URLs for domain-portability,
>> (but it's ambiguous with email addresses). But yeah, I don't
>> like things being tied t
On 2018-08-29 12:02, Eric Wong wrote:
> Anyways I hope to teach public-inbox to auto-linkify Message-ID-looking
> strings "" into URLs for domain-portability,
> (but it's ambiguous with email addresses). But yeah, I don't
> like things being tied to domain names.
This would be very useful for peo
Jeff King wrote:
> I've thought about mirroring it to a public server as well, just for
> redundancy. But without the same domain, I'm not sure it would be all
> that useful as a community resource.
I wouldn't get too attached to the domain, "public-inbox.org" is
too long for my tastes anyways.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:25:13PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> I would like to take five minutes to thank you for public-inbox. It is
> invaluable for me in the meantime. And I think I will never be able to
> thank you enough for it.
Let me echo that appreciation. I have alway
You're very welcome, Johannes. And I'm hoping to have a few
more goodies live this fall/winter for public-inbox :>
Hi Eric,
I would like to take five minutes to thank you for public-inbox. It is
invaluable for me in the meantime. And I think I will never be able to
thank you enough for it.
Just a couple of things where it is super useful to me:
- Recently, my mail provider started dropping mails left and
13 matches
Mail list logo
