On 23.07.2014 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@gmail.com writes:
A git command is generally setup as:
git command [subcommand] [options] ...
The subcommands vary wildly by the nature of the command. However all
subcommands
could at least follow one style. The
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@gmail.com writes:
On 23.07.2014 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sounds familiar. E.g. here is a similar thread about a year ago.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/231376/focus=231478
Further discussions to make the plan more concrete is
On 10.08.2014 20:13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@gmail.com writes:
On 23.07.2014 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sounds familiar. E.g. here is a similar thread about a year ago.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/231376/focus=231478
Further
In the user survey 2012 question 23 (In your opinion, which areas in
Git need improvement?),
the most crucial point identified was the user interface.
I wonder if there are any more recent surveys, showing if this has changed.
Now when we want to improve the user interface, we're likely talking
Stefan Beller stefanbel...@gmail.com writes:
A git command is generally setup as:
git command [subcommand] [options] ...
The subcommands vary wildly by the nature of the command. However all
subcommands
could at least follow one style. The commands bundle, notes, stash and
submodule
5 matches
Mail list logo