Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-05 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > On Fri, Jun 30 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted: > >> * xz/send-email-batch-size (2017-05-23) 1 commit >> - send-email: --batch-size to work around some SMTP server limit >> >> "git send-email" learned to overcome some SMTP server limitation >> that does not allow

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-05 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Junio C Hamano" Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 9:19 PM "Philip Oakley" writes: Am I right that the What's cooking is prepared by a script? Because I have to keep track of so many topics, its maintenance is heavily helped by a script. I do not think it is sensible to expect me to (or it

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-04 Thread Stefan Beller
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Philip Oakley" writes: > >> From: "Junio C Hamano" >> >>> I am not sure what you are asking. Is this the command you are >>> looking for? >>> >>> $ grep -e "^[[*]" whats-cooking.txt >>> >> Ah, thanks. >> >> It does presume that one has e

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Philip Oakley" writes: > From: "Junio C Hamano" > >> I am not sure what you are asking. Is this the command you are >> looking for? >> >> $ grep -e "^[[*]" whats-cooking.txt >> > Ah, thanks. > > It does presume that one has extracted the email to the text file, > which is easier on some system

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Philip Oakley" writes: > Am I right that the What's cooking is prepared by a script? Because I have to keep track of so many topics, its maintenance is heavily helped by a script. I do not think it is sensible to expect me to (or it would be good use of my time) correctly update the list of co

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-03 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Junio C Hamano" "Philip Oakley" writes: Junio, Is it possible to include a table of contents that lists the integration branches, split by your categories, to help find areas of interest? [Graduated to "master"] * topic list [New Topics] [Stalled] [Cooking] [Discarded] The TOC wouldn

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Philip Oakley" writes: > Junio, > Is it possible to include a table of contents that lists the > integration branches, split by your categories, to help find areas of > interest? > > [Graduated to "master"] > * topic list > [New Topics] > [Stalled] > [Cooking] > [Discarded] > > The TOC wouldn't

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-02 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Junio C Hamano" Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. Junio,

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-01 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 01/07/17 09:39, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: On Fri, Jun 30 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted: * xz/send-email-batch-size (2017-05-23) 1 commit - send-email: --batch-size to work around some SMTP server limit "git send-email" learned to overcome some SMTP server limitation that does n

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-07-01 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Fri, Jun 30 2017, Junio C. Hamano jotted: > * xz/send-email-batch-size (2017-05-23) 1 commit > - send-email: --batch-size to work around some SMTP server limit > > "git send-email" learned to overcome some SMTP server limitation > that does not allow many pieces of e-mails to be sent over a

What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2017, #09; Fri, 30)

2017-06-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. You can find the changes described