Re: builtin difftool parsing issue

2017-01-03 Thread Jacob Keller
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Paul Sbarra wrote: >>> I would have expected `git difftool --submodule=diff ...` to work... What >>> are the problems? >> >> The docs for difftool state... >> "git

Re: builtin difftool parsing issue

2017-01-03 Thread Stefan Beller
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Paul Sbarra wrote: >> I would have expected `git difftool --submodule=diff ...` to work... What >> are the problems? > > The docs for difftool state... > "git difftool is a frontend to git diff and accepts the same options > and arguments."

Re: builtin difftool parsing issue

2017-01-02 Thread Paul Sbarra
> I would have expected `git difftool --submodule=diff ...` to work... What > are the problems? The docs for difftool state... "git difftool is a frontend to git diff and accepts the same options and arguments." which could lead a user to expect passing --submodule=diff to have a similar behavior

Re: builtin difftool parsing issue

2017-01-02 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Paul, On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Paul Sbarra wrote: > Sadly, I haven't been able to figure out how to get the mbox file from > this tread into gmail, but wanted to report a parsing issue I've found > with the builtin difftool. > > Original Patch: >

builtin difftool parsing issue

2016-12-21 Thread Paul Sbarra
Sadly, I haven't been able to figure out how to get the mbox file from this tread into gmail, but wanted to report a parsing issue I've found with the builtin difftool. Original Patch: