On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:37:36PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Hey, asciidoc made a move, so this patch is good to go:
> https://github.com/asciidoc/asciidoc/pull/9
Sine this thread is 18 months old, I needed some recap to remember what
we were talking about. :)
It's here:
http://public-inbox
Hey, asciidoc made a move, so this patch is good to go:
https://github.com/asciidoc/asciidoc/pull/9
Thanks.
Olaf
On Tue, Feb 10, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 30, Jeff King wrote:
> >
> > > I have 8.6.9-3 installed (it is par
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 04:17:47PM +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > I have 8.6.9-3 installed (it is part of Debian testing/unstable now),
> > and confirmed that:
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/asciidoc.conf b/Documentation/asciidoc.conf
> > index 2c16c53..10
On Fri, Jan 30, Jeff King wrote:
> I have 8.6.9-3 installed (it is part of Debian testing/unstable now),
> and confirmed that:
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/asciidoc.conf b/Documentation/asciidoc.conf
> index 2c16c53..10c777e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/asciidoc.conf
> +++ b/Documentation/ascii
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:05:36AM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> It's a shame one can't simply replace the [footer-text] template which
> asciidoc insists on.
>
> It turns out asciidoc 8.6.9-3 and later will habe a knob to turn:
>
> https://github.com/asciidoc/asciidoc/pull/9
>
> I'll try an
Junio C Hamano schrieb am 29.01.2015 um 07:18:
> Olaf Hering writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
What file timestamp should be used for them? Likely "../version"?
>>>
>>> I tend to think the "Last updated" timestamp taken from the
>>> filesystem timestamp is a bad practice
Olaf Hering writes:
> On Tue, Jan 27, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> > What file timestamp should be used for them? Likely "../version"?
>>
>> I tend to think the "Last updated" timestamp taken from the
>> filesystem timestamp is a bad practice inherited by these tools from
>> the days back when nob
On Tue, Jan 27, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Olaf Hering writes:
>
> > Several files in Documentation have an unstable 'Last updated' timestamp.
> > The
> > reason is that their mtime changes every time, which prevents reproducible
> > builds.
> >
> > 341 technical/api-index.txt: technical/api-index
Olaf Hering writes:
> Several files in Documentation have an unstable 'Last updated' timestamp. The
> reason is that their mtime changes every time, which prevents reproducible
> builds.
>
> 341 technical/api-index.txt: technical/api-index-skel.txt \
> 342 technical/api-index.sh $(patsubs
On Mon, Jan 26, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Several files in Documentation have an unstable 'Last updated' timestamp. The
> reason is that their mtime changes every time, which prevents reproducible
> builds.
>
> 341 technical/api-index.txt: technical/api-index-skel.txt \
> 342 technical/api-ind
Several files in Documentation have an unstable 'Last updated' timestamp. The
reason is that their mtime changes every time, which prevents reproducible
builds.
341 technical/api-index.txt: technical/api-index-skel.txt \
342 technical/api-index.sh $(patsubst %,%.txt,$(API_DOCS))
343
11 matches
Mail list logo