Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-08 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:46:58PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:51:30AM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > > I think I would also prefer a list of available repositories over a > > hard-coded choice. It may be that some places (say, Australia) have > > better

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-08 Thread Kaartic Sivaraam
On Monday 07 May 2018 11:45 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: >> I could see arguments both ways, so I thought I'd take a straw poll of >> what people on the list think. > > Junios reply below focuses on the URL passed to git-clone, which > is only found at https://git-scm.com/downloads (?) > > There I

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Konstantin Ryabitsev writes: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:51:30AM +, brian m. carlson wrote: >> >> I think I would also prefer a list of available repositories over a >> hard-coded choice. It may be that some places (say, Australia) have >> better bandwidth

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:51:30AM +, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:15:46AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > There I would try to mirror Junios list of "public repositories" > > https://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-public-repositories.html > > without officially endorsing

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread brian m. carlson
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:15:46AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > There I would try to mirror Junios list of "public repositories" > https://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-public-repositories.html > without officially endorsing one over another. I think I would also prefer a list of available

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Stefan Beller
Hi Jeff, On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Jeff King wrote: > The git-scm.com site currently links to https://github.com/git/git for > the (non-tarball) source code. Somebody raised the question[1] of > whether it should point to kernel.org instead. Do people find one > interface

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev
On 05/07/18 07:38, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> The git-scm.com site currently links to https://github.com/git/git for >> the (non-tarball) source code. Somebody raised the question[1] of >> whether it should point to kernel.org instead. >> >> Do people find one interface more or less pleasing

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
than the other? Do we want to prefer > kernel.org as more "official" or less commercial? > > I could see arguments both ways, so I thought I'd take a straw poll of > what people on the list think. > > -Peff > > [1] https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/1202 I perso

Re: main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Peff, On Mon, 7 May 2018, Jeff King wrote: > The git-scm.com site currently links to https://github.com/git/git for > the (non-tarball) source code. Somebody raised the question[1] of > whether it should point to kernel.org instead. > > Do people find one interface more or less pleasing than

main url for linking to git source?

2018-05-07 Thread Jeff King
The git-scm.com site currently links to https://github.com/git/git for the (non-tarball) source code. Somebody raised the question[1] of whether it should point to kernel.org instead. Do people find one interface more or less pleasing than the other? Do we want to prefer kernel.org as more