Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-29 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 02:12:32PM -0400, Phil Hord wrote: > >> (develop)>$ git merge widget_twitter > >> Merge made by the 'recursive' strategy. > >> .../code/community/Dnd/Magentweet/Model/User.php |3 ++- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > Whereas here you do,

Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-29 Thread Phil Hord
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Scott R. Godin wrote: > >> As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more >> verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) >> with --stat or -v .. is it supp

Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-28 Thread Jeff King
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Scott R. Godin wrote: > As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more > verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) > with --stat or -v .. is it supposed to do that? Yes. The diffstat is shown for the comp

Re: merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-26 Thread Scott R. Godin
Looks like I got lost in the press of other issues. anyone? On 10/22/2012 09:39 AM, Scott R. Godin wrote: > As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more > verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) > with --stat or -v .. is it supposed to do that

merge --no-commit not able to report stats more verbosely?

2012-10-22 Thread Scott R. Godin
As you can see from the below, I can't seem to get it to give me more verbose results of what's being merged (as in the actual merge below) with --stat or -v .. is it supposed to do that? (develop)>$ git merge --no-commit --stat -v widget_twitter Automatic merge went well; stopped before committin