Re: some apparent inaccuracies in "man git-worktree"

2017-11-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Eric Sunshine wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day >> wrote: >>> from "man git-worktree", there seem to be some inaccuracies in the >>> SYNOPSIS regarding the "add" subcommand: >>> >>> git

Re: some apparent inaccuracies in "man git-worktree"

2017-11-14 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: > > from "man git-worktree", there seem to be some inaccuracies in the > > SYNOPSIS regarding the "add" subcommand: > > > > git worktree add \ > > [-f] [--detach]

Re: some apparent inaccuracies in "man git-worktree"

2017-11-14 Thread Eric Sunshine
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > from "man git-worktree", there seem to be some inaccuracies in the > SYNOPSIS regarding the "add" subcommand: > > git worktree add \ > [-f] [--detach] [--checkout] [--lock] [-b ] [] > > first, there's no

some apparent inaccuracies in "man git-worktree"

2017-11-14 Thread Robert P. J. Day
more annoying pedantry (but you're used to that by now, right?) ... from "man git-worktree", there seem to be some inaccuracies in the SYNOPSIS regarding the "add" subcommand: git worktree add \ [-f] [--detach] [--checkout] [--lock] [-b ] [] first, there's no mention of "-B" in that