Gitweb:     
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=5bc27dc2f55fd3043597b5a8de6536183f28a449
Commit:     5bc27dc2f55fd3043597b5a8de6536183f28a449
Parent:     e9d4efddbec3d852d435b370b9c40ff7ac24afe6
Author:     Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AuthorDate: Wed Jan 30 13:33:07 2008 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CommitDate: Wed Jan 30 13:33:07 2008 +0100

    x86: pull bp calculation earlier into the backtrace path
    
    Right now, we take the stack pointer early during the backtrace path, but
    only calculate bp several functions deep later, making it hard to reconcile
    the stack and bp backtraces (as well as showing several internal backtrace
    functions on the stack with bp based backtracing).
    
    This patch moves the bp taking to the same place we take the stack pointer;
    sadly this ripples through several layers of the back tracing stack,
    but it's not all that bad in the end I hope.
    
    Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c  |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c  |    7 ++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c    |   39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
index 35a6f31..7a61b54 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ void __show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
        __show_registers(regs, 1);
-       show_trace(NULL, regs, &regs->sp);
+       show_trace(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, regs->bp);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 8c4e4f5..4f4021b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ static void save_stack_address(void *data, unsigned long 
addr, int reliable)
                trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = addr;
 }
 
-static void save_stack_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long addr)
+static void
+save_stack_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
 {
        struct stack_trace *trace = (struct stack_trace *)data;
        if (in_sched_functions(addr))
@@ -65,14 +66,14 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops save_stack_ops_nosched = 
{
  */
 void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
 {
-       dump_trace(current, NULL, NULL, &save_stack_ops, trace);
+       dump_trace(current, NULL, NULL, 0, &save_stack_ops, trace);
        if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
                trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
 }
 
 void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
 {
-       dump_trace(tsk, NULL, NULL, &save_stack_ops_nosched, trace);
+       dump_trace(tsk, NULL, NULL, 0, &save_stack_ops_nosched, trace);
        if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries)
                trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ULONG_MAX;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
index 959d40e..6f3bb28 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
@@ -120,15 +120,6 @@ static inline unsigned long print_context_stack(struct 
thread_info *tinfo,
 {
        struct stack_frame *frame = (struct stack_frame *)bp;
 
-       /*
-        * if EBP is "deeper" into the stack than the actual stack pointer,
-        * we need to rewind the stack pointer a little to start at the
-        * first stack frame, but only if EBP is in this stack frame.
-        */
-       if (stack > (unsigned long *) bp
-                       && valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, frame, sizeof(*frame)))
-               stack = (unsigned long *) bp;
-
        while (valid_stack_ptr(tinfo, stack, sizeof(*stack))) {
                unsigned long addr;
 
@@ -139,7 +130,7 @@ static inline unsigned long print_context_stack(struct 
thread_info *tinfo,
                                frame = frame->next_frame;
                                bp = (unsigned long) frame;
                        } else {
-                               ops->address(data, addr, 0);
+                               ops->address(data, addr, bp == 0);
                        }
                }
                stack++;
@@ -150,11 +141,9 @@ static inline unsigned long print_context_stack(struct 
thread_info *tinfo,
 #define MSG(msg) ops->warning(data, msg)
 
 void dump_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-               unsigned long *stack,
+               unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp,
                const struct stacktrace_ops *ops, void *data)
 {
-       unsigned long bp = 0;
-
        if (!task)
                task = current;
 
@@ -234,20 +223,20 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops print_trace_ops = {
 
 static void
 show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-                  unsigned long * stack, char *log_lvl)
+               unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
 {
-       dump_trace(task, regs, stack, &print_trace_ops, log_lvl);
+       dump_trace(task, regs, stack, bp, &print_trace_ops, log_lvl);
        printk("%s =======================\n", log_lvl);
 }
 
 void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-               unsigned long * stack)
+               unsigned long *stack, unsigned long bp)
 {
-       show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, stack, "");
+       show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, stack, bp, "");
 }
 
 static void show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
-                              unsigned long *sp, char *log_lvl)
+                      unsigned long *sp, unsigned long bp, char *log_lvl)
 {
        unsigned long *stack;
        int i;
@@ -268,13 +257,13 @@ static void show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, 
struct pt_regs *regs,
                printk("%08lx ", *stack++);
        }
        printk("\n%sCall Trace:\n", log_lvl);
-       show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, log_lvl);
+       show_trace_log_lvl(task, regs, sp, bp, log_lvl);
 }
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp)
 {
        printk("       ");
-       show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, "");
+       show_stack_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, 0, "");
 }
 
 /*
@@ -283,13 +272,19 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long 
*sp)
 void dump_stack(void)
 {
        unsigned long stack;
+       unsigned long bp = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+       if (!bp)
+               asm("movl %%ebp, %0" : "=r" (bp):);
+#endif
 
        printk("Pid: %d, comm: %.20s %s %s %.*s\n",
                current->pid, current->comm, print_tainted(),
                init_utsname()->release,
                (int)strcspn(init_utsname()->version, " "),
                init_utsname()->version);
-       show_trace(current, NULL, &stack);
+       show_trace(current, NULL, &stack, bp);
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack);
@@ -314,7 +309,7 @@ void show_registers(struct pt_regs *regs)
                unsigned char c;
 
                printk("\n" KERN_EMERG "Stack: ");
-               show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, KERN_EMERG);
+               show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, 0, KERN_EMERG);
 
                printk(KERN_EMERG "Code: ");
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
index 671a7ec..0ca4815 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ x86_backtrace(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
 
        if (!user_mode_vm(regs)) {
                if (depth)
-                       dump_trace(NULL, regs, (unsigned long *)stack,
+                       dump_trace(NULL, regs, (unsigned long *)stack, 0,
                                   &backtrace_ops, &depth);
                return;
        }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git-commits-head" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to