On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:44:56PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Paul Elliott [130828 06:25]:
> > What is the official git-dpm way to delete a patch
> > that is not wanted anymore? The public branches
> > have been pushed and so cannot be changed, only added
> > to.
> >
> > The way I have been doing it is
> > git-dpm checkout-patched #checkout patched branch
> > rebase -i #remove commit that coresponds to the patch
> > git-dpm update-patches#go back to master with patch deleted in new
> > commits
> >
> >
> > Is this the correct way to remove an unwanted patch?
>
> Yes, it is indeed the correct one. (Except when you drop the last patch
> then you need a --allow-revert to update-patches to avoid the
> child-proof).
In that case, I have found another bug.
If you have a patch that deletes a file, and then
delete that patch, the file should reappear.
It does on the patched branch, but when update-patches
happens the deleted file does not reappear on the master
branch.
If you do a dpkg-source -b on the master branch directory, dpkg-source
notices the discrepancy of the deleted file and gives you a warning.
I have an example of this that I can send you on request.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
---
"Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one
of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint
security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways
around it." Edward Snowden
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Git-dpm-user mailing list
Git-dpm-user@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/git-dpm-user
